{"id":3344,"date":"2017-10-18T09:39:56","date_gmt":"2017-10-17T23:39:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wiseworkplacetraining.com.au\/2021\/09\/11\/grooming-or-an-error-in-judgment\/"},"modified":"2021-09-11T09:40:08","modified_gmt":"2021-09-10T23:40:08","slug":"grooming-or-an-error-in-judgment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wiseworkplacetraining.com.au\/2017\/10\/18\/grooming-or-an-error-in-judgment\/","title":{"rendered":"Grooming, or an Error in Judgment?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"\"<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

No employer likes to think that one of their staff members might deal inappropriately with a client, or even could possibly commit a criminal act. But all employers need to be aware of the potential for professional boundaries to be crossed in these ways. This is particularly important for organisations that work directly with vulnerable members of society, including children, the elderly, and the disabled<\/p>\n

We take a look at when certain behaviours might be deemed to be significant errors of judgment, or in the worst-case scenario, grooming.<\/p>\n

The definitions<\/h3>\n

In NSW, the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 sets out the requirements for people who work with children. It defines misconduct involving children to include the action of ‘grooming’.<\/p>\n

Similarly, Section 25A (1) of the Ombudsman Act 1974 (NSW) considers ‘reportable conduct’ to include:<\/p>\n